and by mad I do mean crazy
I learned my lesson about awards in elementary school. I do want a statement on this and have to admit I am acting more like a politician with this- but there is a part where a need to advise and condemn Europe in this case is necessary. Oslo in my opinion has cheapened the nobel prize by giving the peace prize to Al Gore. He is not a world leader and not in the category for his actions of other nominees. In my opinion only one purpose was served by nominating him. The problem with global warming is not cataclysmic and that has not been established. It may be a natural geologic cycle that occurs and it has not proven that it is caused primarily by greenhouse gasses. I have said all my reasons previously for why global warming is being COMPLETELY BLOWN OUT OF PROPORTION AND CERTAIN PEOPLE LIKE AL GORE SEEM TO BE USING IT TO ATTACK BUSH IN AN UNWARRANTED MANNER AND INDUCE MASS HISTERIA WHICH MAY DAMAGE US ALL. Glonbal warming may be an issue – there may be many ways to solve it – the idea that we will burn up in say 10 years if nothing is done is unfounded – scietists have a very poor historical track record when they predict the future and current predictions for warming are off. All the gloom and doom depends on reading future predictions 50 years off. Speaking this as gospel is very destructive. It is very bad science. In addition perhaps ways to control and cool climate are available if necessary currently. The science on the biofuels is coming out that it is actually WORSE THAN OIL OVERALL IN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. – there has been a credible news report on this on a news show in USA – well known one - I would believe they would do their best not to lie. WHY HAS THE WORLD GONE MAD? I also would like to say one last thing. It appears Oslo and through Europe is trying to influence the American Political Process – they would be completely angry if we did the same with an international institution based in the US. We do have world organizations as well as nations. It is not a perfect process. Other countries will not gain in the end from attacking US political system and trying to influence its results – there are clear rules about this. - Oslo is one thing – trying to use terrorism to influence and control US politcial process by outside sources is another – one is in bad taste – the other which has already happened – will bring severe consequences at some point, there are clear directive that this is not allowed. It would not be tolerated if Rush Limbaugh set up a conservative cell of operatives to influence the French Election this is the equivalent of what they are doing. It will be argued CIA does this in 3rd world – it is hard to see a difference in that and other countries doing it to US on surface – one developed country general respects the sovereignty of another is the rule and that is a difference as we haven't done it in developed Europe and Asia before without invitation and it is the current Australians, North Americans, Europeans, and others who have crossed that line and feel they can direct the world without bearing all the consequences – they do not die in the wars – see what we see – they are not in the end in a place to judge better however much they feel otherwise – we risk our own things – they own treasure and blood and have sovereignty over it and we do not go into Europe and steal their elections and that's that – they are doing it to us. It's not the same as the CIA going into 3rd world and in 2004 we elected Bush and someone in this country decided Bush was a better President than Gore in 2000. That person is apparently vested with that authority and it may come from real power. And the choices being made now by opposition – have many objections – Bush in the end is defending honorable choices – the opposition is not presenting a strategy that appears to logically stack up – the push for biofuels and global warming histeria is not logical given everything else. There is no good plan for ending Iraq war earlier that deals with the massive rammifications of that decision and no one one the true opposition who wants to subvery the Democratic nomination process and then the election has been honest about that. Get the troops out now and screw the consequences has always been the other side's policy. They usually don't say screw the consequences although the Senator from Michigan came very close to that in an interview, but it is the net effect of the policy. The call the president bad for not thinking through occupation, well look at their won follow through. There will be a blood bath in central Asia and they will create it. The knights wish to see the dragon or the Numenoreans wish to defy the Valar (the Valar destroy the island of Numenor and make Gondor settlement for the remaining faithful before “The Hobbit” – the prince of Numenor who is the most powerful prince ever and who leads the siege on Valinor is destroyed very quickly when he challenges the Valar and falls from grace – the entire island is destroyed and all Numenorian civilization is crushed as vegence and accountability and only a few ships of the faithful survive that have to resettle elsewhere on the conitnent Middle Earth ) – whatever metaphor we are headed where no one wants to really see – and if they continue they shall have their wish and regret its long term consequences immediately I will predict.